Tuesday, October 18, 2005

I see this and future use of internet voting as steps toward direct democracy. I predict that within this century, some countries will use direct democracy as the legislative body on the local and regional level. Direct Democracy is where citizens can directly propose and vote on legislation, making representatives redundant.

When democracy was first proposed, it was long argued by the elite that peasants were not smart enough to rule themselves; they needed kings to keep society from collapsing. Even the first democracies were collections of wealthy land-owning males -- almost 90% of the population, including women, slaves, and peasants, were not enfranchised into the government. Well, those naysayers were wrong, and commoners are perfectly capable of running representational democracies.

The thing is, representatives are a compromise anyways. In days when farmers worked 14 hour days 6 days a week, no one had the time to travel meet up with everyone else to discuss politics. The American legal system is based on how long it takes a person travelling on horseback to transmit information.

Now with the advent of the internet and other communication technologies, representatives are redundant. We could propose and vote on laws ourselves, over the internet. Problems such as authentication and verification have been solved in various communication systems. As soon as the general public gets the hang of internet discussions, people will see direct democracy as a reasonable alternative to representational democracy. This could happen within a generation or two.

Of course, current politicians will resist direct democracy, because it puts them out of their incredibly powerful positions.

5:09 PM

2 comments:

at January 11, 2006 at 10:15 PM Jose Ignacio said...

I quite agree with your vision but there is something implacable about laws and that is they are incredibly extensive, and even me, an educated person wouldnt be able to fully grasp the implications of every single law that has to be passed (not to mention the 700+ pages to read).

There are several ways to tackle this problem, friends, relatives, full time politics fans and the like. But i have considered a "phasing out" strategy, where the representatives still carry out their regular jobs but at the time laws have to be passed, a popular vote can count for say 40% of the pool and the representatives for a 60%.

at August 16, 2007 at 1:51 AM B said...

"Educated person wouldnt be able to fully grasp the implications of every single law that has to be passed (not to mention the 700+ pages to read)."

You're just using our current methods for controlling law to base the inability of the public to control and manage. It's been around for 2000+ years:
Direct Democracy

The problem is direct democracy will be hard to get back, the current powers won't want to let their power and control go.